Parliamentary Group and Individual Voting Behaviour in the Finnish Parliament in Year 2003: A Group Cohesion and Voting Simila
نویسندگان
چکیده
Although group cohesion studies are rather common elsewhere, the last analyses of the Finnish parliament Eduskunta were published in the 1960s. This article provides, firstly, a fresh group cohesion analysis using the Agreement Index, which is a modified version of the classic Rice index. Secondly, two advanced voting similarity analyses, together with a new easy-to-understand way of illustrating the results, are provided. Where the Agreement Index operates at the parliamentary party group level, the voting similarity analyses are able to analyse and illustrate the individual MP level. The article is partly methodological in testing the voting similarity methods, however, it also provides insight into the recent voting behaviour within Eduskunta.
منابع مشابه
The Role of Virtual News Networks on Voting Behavior (Case study: Political Science Students Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch in 26 February 2016 Election)
Thepresent study aims to investigate the impact of the virtual news networks onpolitical participation of Iranians in parliamentary election on 26 February2016. The method of...
متن کاملVoting patterns and alliance formation in the European Parliament.
Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have voluntarily formed transnational political groups and invariably follow the voting instructions of these groups. This is intriguing as there are few obvious incentives for doing so. Unlike national parties, for example, the political groups in the European Parliament are not punished by the electorate if they are divided on key issues, as citizens ...
متن کاملCohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities
We study the cohesion within and the coalitions between political groups in the Eighth European Parliament (2014-2019) by analyzing two entirely different aspects of the behavior of the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) in the policy-making processes. On one hand, we analyze their co-voting patterns and, on the other, their retweeting behavior. We make use of two diverse datasets in the...
متن کاملExplaining Parliamentary Party Cohesion : Can Psychology Help ?
Parliaments in most established democracies are characterised by high levels of political party cohesion in voting. Political scientists tend to explain this behaviour in terms of individual incentives, implicitly or explicitly applying a logic of rational choice. Cohesion is linked to discipline, and the powers available to party whips: for example control over resources, reselection opportuni...
متن کاملE-voting in Estonia
Estonia has one of the most established e-voting systems in the world. Internet voting remote e-voting using the voter’s own equipment was piloted in 2005 [12] (with the first real elections using e-voting being conducted the same year) and has been in use ever since. So far, the Estonian internet voting system has been used for the whole country in three sets of local elections, two European P...
متن کامل